Web 2.0 Validator

Author: May

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading ...

18 Dec

Well ofcourse I know my site won’t even near web 2.0 but it’s always good to test and see where you stand.
Seem like I stand far off. 7/36.
This Web 2.0 validator is still in beta with 36 check list/rules. I’m not sure it’s a real validator or not cos’ some points are just silly but some are good points to note.

Uses inline AJAX ?
Is in public beta?
Uses python?
Uses the prefix “meta” or “micro”?
Is Shadows-aware ?
Uses Cascading Style Sheets?
Uses Google Maps API?
Refers to mash-ups ?
Attempts to be XHTML Strict ?
Appears to be web 3.0 ?
Mentions startup ?
Has favicon ?
Appears to use AJAX ?
Refers to the Web 2.0 Validator’s ruleset ?
Mentions Dave Legg ?
Makes reference to Technorati ?
Appears to be built using Ruby on Rails ?
Refers to VCs ?
Refers to Flickr ?
Mentions Nitro ?
Links Slashdot and Digg ?
Mentions Cool Words ?
Has prototype.js ?
Creative Commons license ?
Use Catalyst ?
Uses microformats ?
Actually mentions Web 2.0 ?
Refers to web2.0validator ?
Refers to del.icio.us ?
Refers to Rocketboom ?
Mentions RDF and the Semantic Web?
Validates as XHTML 1.1 ?
References isometric.sixsided.org?
Mentions 30 Second Rule and Web 2.0 ?
Appears to have Adsense ?
Uses the “blink” tag?

Believe me, I don’t understand/heard of some of those terms used in above check list.
But I could definitely improve my current point of 7 to a few more by doing these:
# Refers to web2.0validator
# Validates as XHTML 1.1
# Mentions 30 Second Rule and Web 2.0
# Mentions Cool Words (what the heck! like what?)
# Mentions Dave Legg (Ok… Dave Legg!!)
# Actually mentions Web 2.0 (Web 2.0, Web 2.0, Web 2.0)